Skip to comments.
Calvin Klein billboard: Threesome or orgy?
The Examiner ^
| June 21, 2009
| Heather Hogue
Posted on 06/22/2009 12:53:33 PM PDT by Heather Hogue
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Bratch
The person who did the set up doesnt know anything about straight guys...no way would a straight guy put his head on another guys lap for one thing...and whats with the guy on the floor? Is he supposed to be passed out?
61
posted on
06/22/2009 1:31:16 PM PDT
by
FeliciaCat
(I like my money where I can see it...hanging in my closet.)
To: FeliciaCat
The guy on the floor is fantasizing about the other two guys ... and “taking care of himself”.
62
posted on
06/22/2009 1:32:51 PM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Heather Hogue
Shouldn’t the tile be: “Tournante”?
63
posted on
06/22/2009 1:33:20 PM PDT
by
liberte
To: chris37
It is FAR OUTSIDE of the male code of conduct for one male to lay is head in the lap of another male. They're obviously gay. All three of them. I'd bet the one 'kissing' the girl ran to ladies room right after the shoot and washed his mouth out.
64
posted on
06/22/2009 1:34:51 PM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: autumnraine
They would only be outraged if she got pregnant and had the baby.
65
posted on
06/22/2009 1:39:51 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: stuartcr
Oh, that does sound bad, lol! No, it was a school related site and the parents’ forum is down the page from the students’ forum, so being a nosey parent....
66
posted on
06/22/2009 1:42:31 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
To: bgill
Glad to hear it! Some kids are still not being raised by wolves. Seriously, I suspect most women still want a relationship and a family. Men have always been a little more flexible, altho I don’t know many who would want to share a girl with 2 or 3 other guys.
67
posted on
06/22/2009 1:45:10 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: top 2 toe red
Oh, I thought he got bored watching and fell asleep....
68
posted on
06/22/2009 1:47:14 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: Heather Hogue
Looks more like the kind of thing God wiped out entire towns for in the Old Testament.
69
posted on
06/22/2009 1:47:32 PM PDT
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism, it's the new black.)
To: SolidWood
70
posted on
06/22/2009 1:50:40 PM PDT
by
La Lydia
(.)
To: Heather Hogue
71
posted on
06/22/2009 1:50:53 PM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Clemenza
They were creepy but they were also totally awkward. The photog sounded like he couldn’t think of anything to say and the kids seemed to be completely stupid, or maybe just out of their element. If I had come up with that ad campaign, I would be really embarrassed.
72
posted on
06/22/2009 1:53:42 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
It’s only an effective ad if it sells jeans. That remains to be seen.
73
posted on
06/22/2009 1:55:11 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: brytlea
Lol...at least probably not what calvin klein wants us to believe...
74
posted on
06/22/2009 1:59:45 PM PDT
by
top 2 toe red
(O-B-A-M-A = One Big Ass Mistake, America.)
To: top 2 toe red
LOL I shudder to think what Calvin wants us to believe!
75
posted on
06/22/2009 2:03:10 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: Rumplemeyer
The only problem with ignoring them is that it creates a response that is even more outrageous in a vain attempt to grab attention. The next ad will be a pre-teen girl completely naked with strategic photo coverage to hide anything too “risqué” .
To: Bratch
No need to worry about that young woman - all the guys sure look gay to me
(Not that there’s anything wrong with that - Seinfeld) /s
77
posted on
06/22/2009 2:16:24 PM PDT
by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: ETL
nothing “cool” at all to us but...to them. Well, it draws attention which they so badly need and require. I wonder why? Seems sad to me but...better them than me. I wouldn’t buy their products and...they are not CHEAP ... well, their ads are but not their products. No way. We like a little more class.
To: SeaDragon
79
posted on
06/22/2009 4:33:11 PM PDT
by
RikaStrom
(Bitter? Who me? Nah, I'm just clinging to my guns!)
To: Heather Hogue
So Camel cigarettes, et al, cannot market their products to minors -- and it's still up to some debate as to whether
that was happening or not -- but Calvin Klein can peddle amarital and (likely) unprotected sex to minors without concern.
Sounds like situation normal in America.
80
posted on
06/22/2009 5:33:30 PM PDT
by
alancarp
(Obama: treat the unborn with AT LEAST as much respect as you do terrorists!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson