Skip to comments.
Governor Palin & New Attorney General Take-On Øbama Admin Over Off-Shore Drilling
Governor Palin 4 President ^
Posted on 06/18/2009 9:54:35 AM PDT by MaxCUA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
06/18/2009 9:54:36 AM PDT
by
MaxCUA
To: MaxCUA
2
posted on
06/18/2009 9:55:45 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: MaxCUA; All
3
posted on
06/18/2009 9:56:42 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Can't Stop the Signal!)
To: MaxCUA
Go Sarah, hang a good one on the Libtards!
4
posted on
06/18/2009 9:57:07 AM PDT
by
GOYAKLA
(My Tee shirt for 2009-2012:" I voted FRED don't you wish you did")
To: GOYAKLA
Way to go Sarah! Tell BHO where and how to stick it!
5
posted on
06/18/2009 9:57:35 AM PDT
by
Free America52
(I just want it to be the way it always has been.)
To: Abbeville Conservative; sleepwalker; Roses0508; feedback doctor; LibLieSlayer; ...
Palin PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
6
posted on
06/18/2009 10:00:52 AM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
To: Free America52
If she can run the country half as good as she runs Alaska...
7
posted on
06/18/2009 10:01:19 AM PDT
by
DonaldC
To: jessduntno
My advice to Alaska:
- Begin drilling offshore
- Being drilling in ANWR
- Declare State sovereignty and make the Federal Government prove authoritarian rule
8
posted on
06/18/2009 10:05:00 AM PDT
by
rjsimmon
(1-20-2013)
To: MaxCUA
I think we are starting to see a much more eligible Sarah Palin.
She is one of the FEW GOP luminaries to take on the Monstrosity in the Oval Office and his evil minions.
Michelle Bachmann is another.
Grassely was on FOX this morning trying to look oppositional regarding the Administration's growing Inspector General scandal. He didn't look convincing.
Sarah Palin ALWAYS looks convincing because she says what she believes. The fossil GOP establishment regulars only believe in getting themselves re-elected - again and again and again and again..etc.
9
posted on
06/18/2009 10:05:37 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: rjsimmon
Agree 100%. After all, what could Obama do to stop her?
10
posted on
06/18/2009 10:05:53 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
To: ZULU
Palin/Bachmann sounds good to me.
11
posted on
06/18/2009 10:07:36 AM PDT
by
Califreak
(Dissident under duress)
To: rjsimmon
DRILL BABY DRILL
12
posted on
06/18/2009 10:09:08 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Califreak
13
posted on
06/18/2009 10:09:16 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: rjsimmon
Declare State sovereignty and make the Federal Government prove authoritarian rule
Doesn’t that mean that the state can’t take any money at all from the Federal Government? Also what would happen to the bases in Alaska. They would immediately be closed down as they are federal. I might not understand what happens when a state declares solverenty.
To: ZULU
Michelle Bachmann is another.
Michelle reminds me of Katherine Harris who ran a horrible campaign a few years back. Let’s leave Michelle running Michigan and keep Sarah as the front runner of the Republican for President.
To: napscoordinator
Michelle reminds me of Katherine Harris
????????????????
She sounded pretty sharp questioning Little Timmy Geitner a few weeks ago.
16
posted on
06/18/2009 10:22:41 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: napscoordinator
Minnesota. Not the hellhole that is Michigan.
17
posted on
06/18/2009 10:23:23 AM PDT
by
DJ Republica
(Sarah Palin is my commander-in-chief. Obama can go to hell.)
To: napscoordinator
Doesn’t that mean that the state can’t take any money at all from the Federal Government? I certainly hope so. This would also mean, they do not SEND any monies to the Federal Government.
Every State in the Union should be self-sufficient. The relationship amonsgt the various States should be their revenue. The Federal Governments part should come in regulating trade.
The military bases should close, if they are superfluous. What this means depends upon their intended use and actual use.
18
posted on
06/18/2009 10:24:52 AM PDT
by
rjsimmon
(1-20-2013)
To: rjsimmon
I heard Alaska takes more money from the Federal than they give. Now I don’t know if they count those bases which is a big “bill” on the Federal Government.
To: DJ Republica
lol. Sorry wrong state...I love Minnesota...Although with the senate situation I can’t say Minnesota is all that impressive at the moment. Michigan is 100 times worse that is for sure.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
