The anonymity must have been given by the paper that reported it - even if the sender redacted his own information from the rest of the chain, the sending address would have appeared on the email that came to the reporter's inbox.
I checked and her pay rate is a matter of public record.
She’s making over $100k per year.
Maybe she should consider applying for a job with Madam Boxer...
Maybe. I still wonder what is going on here. I’m the suspicious type. She tells the anonymous person about influence peddling in DC and that they were being played. The more I read the emails the more suspicious I get. We’re talking about a Dem lobbyist that wants influence and got a lesson about presuming. Wonder if more info will ever come out?