[DJ MacWoW]

I’m not arguing the fact that it is not be proper etiquette, or even that it could be considered rude.

Yeah. You did but I guess you thought about it.

But people make mistakes, and to hound someone for it is even more improper, in my opinion.

As I said, it was over-reaction. But you didn't comment on who released the private emails and for what purpose.

I've skipped through them again and I don't see the anonymous person being hounded for an apology. I see Becton trying to find out who told the anonymous person to call her "Liz".

[FreedomOfExpression]

I’m not arguing the fact that it is not be proper etiquette, or even that it could be considered rude.

Yeah. You did but I guess you thought about it.

Is that a polite way to call me a liar? I never argued that it was proper to call her by anything other than the name she gave to them. Point to a post where I said that. You may have misinterpreted post 116, where I was trying to point out that you were minimizing her actions by continuing to bring up the impropriety of the initial email that started all of this.
Yes, okay, we know that. We also know she is an unhinged loon, which is my point.

As I said, it was over-reaction. But you didn't comment on who released the private emails and for what purpose.

I couldn't care less who released the emails or why.

...I don't see the anonymous person being hounded for an apology....

I never said she hounded someone for an apology, just that she hounded them.

It's obvious you have some emotional stake in this issue, whereas I am just stating how batty this woman is for not letting go of it after an initial tirade or two.