Replies

Articles in Schneller v. Cortes (brief "history" of case).

1 posted on 06/15/2009 11:09:53 AM PDT by rxsid

To: hoosiermama; Red Steel; null and void; LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Amityschild; Calpernia; ...

Ping.

2 posted on 06/15/2009 11:10:36 AM PDT by rxsid

To: rxsid

I hate to be negative on such an important issue but
“DISTRIBUTION” seems to be the way the Supremes throw cases into the waste paper basket.

3 posted on 06/15/2009 11:12:29 AM PDT by InterceptPoint

To: rxsid; All

the problem is stating the injury... even if it was invalid, it doesn’t change the effect of the election since McCain still lost

6 posted on 06/15/2009 11:21:30 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)

To: rxsid

12 posted on 06/15/2009 11:40:54 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)

To: rxsid

Bump read.

14 posted on 06/15/2009 1:12:09 PM PDT by Red Steel

To: rxsid

What if we bury the SCOTUS in these appeals??????

15 posted on 06/16/2009 7:04:56 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)

To: rxsid

Schneller v. Cortes: Distributed for SCOTUS Conference

And turned down by the court. Docket 08-9797

18 posted on 06/22/2009 12:04:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794