To: curth
What is the point? If they get rid of Letterman they’ll just replace him with somebody just as sleazy but younger.
2 posted on
06/10/2009 5:00:12 PM PDT by
exist
To: exist
These defamatory slurs can’t be accepted. Letterman needs to go or at least apologize without any reservations. It doesn’t matter whether someone else might “replace” him. Actions have consequences.
13 posted on
06/10/2009 5:03:46 PM PDT by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to become slaves of Washington.")
To: exist
The point? The point? Sorry you don't get it. Wrong is wrong.
Had he said this about Obama's kids he would already be gone.
33 posted on
06/10/2009 5:23:25 PM PDT by
LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot
("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)
To: exist
What is the point? If they get rid of Letterman they’ll just replace him with somebody just as sleazy but younger. If you wrote this in a personal capacity, your moral inability to see the extreme significance of this particular slander is duly noted.
If you wrote this in a professional capacity, your multiplication of the outrage through professed indifference is duly noted.
35 posted on
06/10/2009 5:25:37 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson