Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/08/2009 9:19:57 AM PDT by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bs9021

I’ve never understood how underage girls can get abortions without parental consent.

If we treated abortion or abortion pills as any other medical treatment, you would see many forms with parental consent signatures required before anything could be done.

If you send your daughter to girl scout camp, many medical history and parental consent forms need to be filled out, including those granting permission for emergency medical treatment.

Yet on “health” matters related to abortion or a girl’s reproductive matters, parental consent is specifically not required, and in some cases avoided altogether.

If the core of Roe vs. Wade is that abortion is like any other medical procedure, why isn’t it treated the same as other medical procedures? And if underage girls need parental permission for medical procedures or medications, why are matters related to abortion exempted?

In fact, if Roe vs. Wade was intended for adult women, of legal age, to make these decisions, how is it that the same reasoning filtered down to teenage girls, who by law are not consenting adults and need parental permission for anything else?


2 posted on 06/08/2009 9:27:08 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson