This is Bravo Sierra, but who has the time to refute it? I can assure you that if someone has a better description of something than the present “truth” then the new description will be the next “truth” and so forth. In Science we only have temporary “truth” and are always trying to improve it.
Naturally, some descriptions (such as classical mechanic) are very good and thus a good description of the “truth” while other are bad (What is the heaviest possible stable atom, check my web site “Island of instability”).
This is Bravo Sierra, but who has the time to refute it?
***There’s money in it for ya if ya buy my contracts at Intrade. So I’m saying that the refutation of cold fusion is Bravo Sierra 01100010 01110101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01110100