Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: max americana

I’m not Catholic, so I never got understood all the fuss about the DiVinci Code. I finally saw it on DVD and it was just plain dull. For a thriller, there wasn’t much and Tom Hanks sounded like he had a cold the whole movie.

Sounds like more of the same for this one. I’ll probably watch it once it hits DVD, but I’m not expecting much.


11 posted on 05/17/2009 12:00:55 PM PDT by packrat35 (Nancy Pelosi is a liar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: packrat35

Actually it’s much faster than DaVinci Code, and I agree, it was a snore fest. This time, the pace has improved but they should;ve replaced Hanks. It’s like he was just plain tired..Ah well, it’s not like I paid for the ticket.


12 posted on 05/17/2009 12:06:26 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: packrat35

Angels is much better than DaVinci. It’s fast paced with action shots of cars almost but not quite (don’t wanna call attention to something that might be wrong to the world msm) racing through Rome and the music is pretty good. However, I wonder if someone who hasn’t read the book could follow since it’s so condensed. At least read the synopsis before going.


13 posted on 05/17/2009 1:47:39 PM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson