Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2009 10:39:34 AM PDT by DrGop0821
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DrGop0821
Donald Trump on Miss California: “Same as Barack 0bama”
You know, he's right...


 

2 posted on 05/12/2009 10:40:15 AM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
Carrie repeatedly lied when she said these photos did not exist, yet Trump totally ignored the issue, saying some of the pics were beautiful, some were racy, but they were fine and lovely.

Prejean made the point at the press conference that she answered the question honestly. The question involved only pictures taken for publication. Not pictures taken for portfolios, etc., and not for publication.

3 posted on 05/12/2009 10:42:01 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

Uh DrGop,

If you look at the picture, she has a top on. It’s just not fully covering all the parts you (but not I) want covered. This photo almost equals the swimsuit edition of Sports Illlustrated. Wow! What a scandal.

Have you enjoyed FR since registering a few months ago?


7 posted on 05/12/2009 10:47:14 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
Here's the best part. Carrie said the pics we just posted were the result of a "windy" day.

STILL INNOCENT!

8 posted on 05/12/2009 10:47:29 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

So now we are worried about the out-takes that were never published previously or planned for publication (until now)...

Insane, just flippin’ insane!


10 posted on 05/12/2009 10:47:44 AM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

Oh noes, a nipple.

Guess what... in normal photo shoots, if they release the whole thing, you get a whole lot more exposure than is shown in these handful of photos.


11 posted on 05/12/2009 10:47:51 AM PDT by TheZMan ("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
I give Mr. Trump a round of applause for his decision. It was all about the homosexual mafia and their agenda and he stood up to the sodomites.

However, I do not like that fact she is representing herself for the Christian community. The Bible does not condone her behavior of exposing herself to make money or a career. Just quite the opposite. A woman is to be modest and of undisputable character. So this matter is a mixed bag of what the 'world' likes to dwell upon.

16 posted on 05/12/2009 10:51:20 AM PDT by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

TMZ was also calling her a gay-basher


17 posted on 05/12/2009 10:51:30 AM PDT by NRA1995 (I'd be embarrased to be driving a Yaris....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
Who wrote this. Parez Hilton?
18 posted on 05/12/2009 10:51:43 AM PDT by McGruff (Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

If any of you have daughters who aspire to modeling may I suggest that at the very least you demand contractually copies of any and all photos taken. Sometimes, more often than is reported I am sure, photographers intentionally capture candids, changing photos, and out-takes that are not exactly what the girls intended for a non-nude shoot.


20 posted on 05/12/2009 10:54:27 AM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
Propoganda in action!

1. The new photos are released "just in time" as Trump is making his decision on Prejean keeping her crown. no attempt at influencing his decision, right?

2. NO mention of Miss Rhode Island.

3. No search (mentioned) for risque photos of any other Miss USA contestants, who, presumably, kept their mouths shut, or spoke the politically correct line.

4. "Outrage" at Prejean appearing at pro-hetero marriage events. You know there would be no "outrage" expressed if she had appeared at events supporting homo-marriage.

26 posted on 05/12/2009 11:03:17 AM PDT by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

FIRST PHOTO: Michael Phelps & Miss California- No Gay Marriage here!
Posted on Apr 25, 2009 @ 09:00AM
radaronline.com

While both Carrie Prejean and Michael Phelps continue to be dismissive of relationship rumors (even her grandmother confirmed to RadarOnline.com that the two have been on multiple dates), a new photo of their first weekend together has surfaced.

Taken in Septemer 2008 at the Palms Hotel in Las Vegas where they were both staying, the two are clearly having a good time (then 21-year old Prejean grins from ear-to-ear as she holds what looks like an icy cocktail).

They two continued to see each other after the weekend. Phelps took her to a Michigan football game last season and a Cleveland Browns football game last fall.

"He always calls her when he is in town and they go out." Prejean's grandmother Jeanette Coppolla told RadarOnline.com.

"Carrie knows that he has dated a lot of girls but she enjoys going out with him and isn't serious about being in a relationship with him," she added. "He's a nice guy and she likes him."

27 posted on 05/12/2009 11:04:17 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

LOL! If those had been pix of The Donald I wuz gonna hit the Abuse button... ;-)


28 posted on 05/12/2009 11:04:26 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
It's settled; Carrie wins!

Yes, it is settled.

But that won't stop the gay mafia from yapping on about it ad nauseum.

They just get THO vexthed when they don't get their way.

29 posted on 05/12/2009 11:06:34 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

No question about it. INNOCENT.


30 posted on 05/12/2009 11:07:29 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

WTH’s the matter with folks that they are so miserable they want to see another person go to ruin?

on second thought, there IS Pelosi. Hmmmmmm.

Nevermind.


31 posted on 05/12/2009 11:07:53 AM PDT by hoe_cake (A proud member of the Society of the Descendents of the Signers of the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821
Why is it a lie? She said she was on bluff above the beach and the wind was blowing. When it blew her vest open the photog assured her he wouldn't use anything that showed too much. She believed he would only use the one pic. Anyone who has tried to take pictures at the beach knows she's right.

I believe her.

Harvey Levin, the gay creator of TMZ was determined to destroy her. He lost.

33 posted on 05/12/2009 11:16:40 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

Our head tax guy cheats the fed out of taxes. And so on, through most, if not all, the nominees.

A chick who is judged on the appearance of her body shows her body.

Yeah, I can see how she need to be burned at the stake. Break out the burkas.


37 posted on 05/12/2009 11:47:34 AM PDT by DPMD (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrGop0821

I must be in a parallel universe. The one I’m used to puts up Joan of Arc or Mother Theresa as Christian role models for women, the other defends a young confused girl who gets naked for photo shoots and pumps up her boobs to DD’s to help her win a beauty pageant whose ultimate goal is the objectification of womens bodies at the expense of their hearts and soul.

Oh ya, I forgot. She came out against same sex marriage so that trumps all previous considerations...like modesty, humility, chastity. And the most obscene aspect is she keeps defending the nude pics (wardrobe malfunction? Huh? Give me a break) and the boob job as if those are acceptable Christian objectives as long as you can make a few bucks along the way.

Prejean doesn’t need to be condemned for this...she is young and confused, but she should not be held up as a role model and those Christians doing backflips to rationalize the events and spin them as mainstream Christian values need to take a long look at themselves. Prejean needs counseling, not congratulations and adoration.

BTW - Anyone out there who thinks this is some kind of plus for your issues is simply deluded, it is a huge loss. Prejean looks at best inconsistent and at worst vacuous, hypocritical and morally ignorant.

But, if this is the mountain you want die on, go ahead and immolate yourself.


41 posted on 05/12/2009 1:05:30 PM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson