To: Balt
I am trying to understand the point of this article about Rush. Does the author want Rush to change and if so, in what way? Rush is, IMO, Everyman. My flaws might exceed those of Rush, or not. His virtues might exceed mine, or not. We will both answer to the same God and that is the only judge that matters. Rush, like all of us, has excesses in many directions and I would not even attempt to judge his spirituality, considering that I struggle with my own. He has been willing to put himself in the public arena far longer than he needed to secure his personal wealth. I think that Rush needs time off frequently. Those of us who listen to him chronicle the horrible daily destruction of this Republic by this socialist traitor administration are helped by knowing we still have a spokesperson who does not shy away from confrontation with these traitors. I wish Rush happiness however he defines it. He is wise to take time off and mingle with others, whatever their political persuasion. His radio time is intense and he needs to refresh mentally. I appreciate what Rush does for this country and pray that he perseveres in spite of the self righteous nit picking from whatever source.
45 posted on
05/06/2009 4:46:55 PM PDT by
mountainfolk
(God Bless The United States of America)
To: mountainfolk
Does the author want Rush to change and if so, in what way? The author wants Rush to go back and marry his first wife. And then he'll be REALLY happy. (Yeah, my eyes are rolling).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson