There is no compromise when it comes to the murder of the unborn.
No compromising with Baby Killers.
Correct!
Pro-abortionist: I want to kill 1,000,000 babies/yr. in the US.
Pro-Life: I do not want to kill any babies in the US!
Where's the compromise?!?!?!?!
This is a great idea by the President. Compromise on this issue is long overdue. In fact, his vision shouldn't be so limited— we should have a compromise on all forms of homicide. Say for example, assassination. Why limit compromises just to the deliberate killing of one's offspring during early stages of embryonic or fetal development? Why not demonstrate the same sort of moral flexibility, and compromise on the killing of full grown heads of state as well? We need to understand that killing, say a president, is a hard moral choice, and that nobody really wants to be in the position of having to make that decision. Nobody is reeeally pro-assasination. But if my fellow Americans make a mistake, we don't want them “to be punished with a baby politician!”
Homicide is an issue that need not divide Americans anymore. As long as we take the steps to insure that presidential assassinations are rare, everyone should be perfectly happy. And since 50,000,000,000 dead babies murdered since Roe vs. Wade is considered “rare,” I think we can agree that it would be very easy for us to take the steps to ensure that all other forms of homicide will be rare as well.
And since Janet Napolatono can send can send as many people over to try and intimidate me as she wants, (I'm not going to shut up about the Democrats murdering children, regardless,) I guess I will go ahead and post it.
And for any Secret Service types reading this, I am not advocating for the assassination of any heads of state. I'm pointing out flawed thinking underlying the disingenuous rhetoric of our current president. I neither support the murder of children by abortion, nor the murder of a president, no matter how corrupt, and dishonest he is. Finding a compromise on abortion is a lot like finding a compromise on slavery. You can't do it. Either you think human beings are property or you don't. In the case of abortion, either you think it's acceptable to intentionally dispose of innocent human lives like unwanted garbage, or you don't. There is no compromise, and in the end, we will win this one, and President Obama will go down in history as a notorious villian for his advocacy for homicide by abortion and infanticide. (See Barack Obama, Born Alive Infant Protection Act.)
how bout this compromise...since you think abortion is
acceptable, why not perform a late term abortion on one of your children? How is that any different from your position
of allowing born-alive babies to be left to die?