To: hotdogjones
Thank goodness.
I thought that they might be making see-through port-a-potties.....
2 posted on
05/03/2009 7:24:13 PM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weight-lifting sessions each week and...)
To: hotdogjones
Sorry, but this is a a bit too creepy.
To: hotdogjones
something about your Freeper ID:)
4 posted on
05/03/2009 7:24:47 PM PDT by
TornadoAlley3
(Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
To: hotdogjones
Well I’m confessing right now.
My name is John
I can change
If I have to
I guess.
5 posted on
05/03/2009 7:24:59 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: hotdogjones
But, but, I was just looking for a date.
The Craigslist entry didn’t mention money changing hands...
6 posted on
05/03/2009 7:25:12 PM PDT by
sinanju
To: hotdogjones
Well, that is very ‘commendable,’ but when we allow corrupt politicians to serve, it seems azz-backwarkds to prosecute these folks.
7 posted on
05/03/2009 7:25:26 PM PDT by
elpinta
To: hotdogjones
To: hotdogjones
like this?
To: hotdogjones
10 posted on
05/03/2009 7:25:45 PM PDT by
txroadkill
(Tax Day Tea Parties 4/15/09 - - The day we won one for the Gipper.)
To: hotdogjones
a “pimps and hoes with aids” site might do more to deter “johns.” imho.
To: hotdogjones
And this from someone calling himself “hotdogjones”!
Irony ... All is irony ...
13 posted on
05/03/2009 7:30:22 PM PDT by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy only goes so far)
To: hotdogjones
"If you wonder why the right-wing scumbags ... Uhh, it's moonbat doody.
14 posted on
05/03/2009 7:31:31 PM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: hotdogjones
No one is so stupid as to use their real names or use credit cards and checks with hookers are they?
Besides Bob Beckel...
To: hotdogjones
The “exposer” seems to be the sicko here.
19 posted on
05/03/2009 7:41:51 PM PDT by
Krankor
(iT EMINDS ME)
To: hotdogjones
I think too many people are exposed on the internet as it is. Oh, wait... nevermind.
Seriously, if society were capable of shunning behaviour adequately, we wouldn’t need government control. Libertarians ought to support the evolution of handling such matters without the need for government intervention. Don’t like people knowing what you’re doing with prostitutes? Don’t do it. But if you do, don’t look to big govenment to protect you from disapproval.
24 posted on
05/03/2009 8:35:11 PM PDT by
dangus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
