Skip to comments.
Terror Threats Against George Bush Statue in Eureka Ca
Old Glory Radio ^
| 04/22/09
| Old Glory Radio
Posted on 04/22/2009 8:46:48 AM PDT by locke22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
We are aware of the threats and are not able at this time to discuss any investigation by federal and local authorities. We can say that the Topix forum hosting corporate office is aware of the situation of their service being used to further terroristic threats.
1
posted on
04/22/2009 8:46:48 AM PDT
by
locke22
To: locke22
Good grief. And we’re the ones they’re worried about.
2
posted on
04/22/2009 8:48:37 AM PDT
by
TexasBeth
To: locke22
Whew!! Good thing its not a threat from those crazy RW extremists; Homeland Security has been warning us about.
3
posted on
04/22/2009 8:49:28 AM PDT
by
skully
(Right Wing Extremist : Someone who loves America more then a liberal)
To: TexasBeth
Because after 40 years of bomb throwing liberals, they have now risen to the highest ranks of power in this country and can have the political purge of Conservatives that they have dreamed of for 40 years.
It isn’t the crime they are prosecuting, it is the ideology.
4
posted on
04/22/2009 8:49:48 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
To: TexasBeth
5
posted on
04/22/2009 8:49:53 AM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The smallest minority on earth is the 'individual'.)
To: locke22
a bunch of real brave PUNKS, would love to sit, ( I know, I can be a tree sitter )and wait on them to show
To: locke22
local and state left wing radicals Freedom Fighters.
If they were tea party attendees they would be right wing terrorists. /s
7
posted on
04/22/2009 8:51:33 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: tubebender
8
posted on
04/22/2009 8:52:30 AM PDT
by
Roccus
(The Capitol, the White House, the Court house.....................America's Axis of Evil!)
To: peace with honor
they actually think the feds don’t investigate things like this, idiots.
9
posted on
04/22/2009 9:02:06 AM PDT
by
locke22
To: locke22
Yo Janet, got some more bombers for you to take a look at.
10
posted on
04/22/2009 9:03:06 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: locke22
Please don't disagree with Obama, we must have bipartisanship. No criticism allowed.
But blowing up a statue of GW is OK, because we didn't like him.
This logic escapes me.
11
posted on
04/22/2009 9:03:39 AM PDT
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: skully
Really! You saw the unrestrained mayhem that ensued at those tea parties... oh wait a minute that was the leftists at the G20! Never mind.
12
posted on
04/22/2009 9:05:12 AM PDT
by
madameguinot
(Our Father's God to Thee, Author of Liberty)
To: locke22
When BO gets a statue erected in Ithaca, Austin, Burlington, wherever I doubt he’ll strike the same powerful pose as W.
He’ll be wiping his skinny arse with the Constitution in his and all will be well.
13
posted on
04/22/2009 9:05:18 AM PDT
by
albie
To: locke22
I just can not wrap my pea brain around such craziness. Is there no end to what the far left will stoop to when something happens they do not happen to like?
Rally around abortion clinics . . . kill babies cause it is our right but blow up a statue of Bush cause he is evil. Good Lord what on earth is happening to this society???
14
posted on
04/22/2009 9:06:54 AM PDT
by
RepubRep
(God Bless America and may He guard our borders until we WAKE UP and do it ourselves!!)
To: locke22
Words have meaning. You cannot terrorize a statute. You can threaten it, you can vandalize it, you can blow it up, you can pull it down, you can expose it to bird poop. But it is not a conscious being, and cannot be terrorized.
15
posted on
04/22/2009 9:09:00 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: La Lydia
It’s true that the statue is an inanimate thing but it is an expresion of speech or beliefes. Any attack on the statue is an attack on the beliefes of others.
16
posted on
04/22/2009 9:13:03 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: cripplecreek
So, an attack on the beliefs of others, as opposed to an attack on others, is an act of terrorism?
17
posted on
04/22/2009 9:20:11 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: La Lydia
You do not know the defination of terror. The victim of terror is never the intended target.
18
posted on
04/22/2009 9:24:13 AM PDT
by
locke22
To: locke22
Word to idiot liberals, George W Bush doesn’t have the power anymore to do anything. None ,nilch, nada.
To: La Lydia
So, an attack on the beliefs of others, as opposed to an attack on others, is an act of terrorism?
In a sense yes. The threat to blow up a statue is a pretty extreme thing to do. It's a little hard to see this as less than a threat to the ideology behind the statue. The bombing of an abortion clinic may not be a direct attack on abortion supporters but it is a threat just the same as burning down churches.
20
posted on
04/22/2009 9:26:29 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson