Lots more people need bulletproof clothing than this dweeb will ever know.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
There has never been anything that is "bullet proof".
Bullet-resistant is more appropriate.
The phonebook you have in your desk is "bullet resistant" to .25 ACP, but aim a .30-06 Springfield and it will go right through....thus the age old battle between the arrow and the knight.
2 posted on
04/20/2009 8:09:17 AM PDT by
DCBryan1
(Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They may “need” it, but do they have $12,000 to drop on a bulletproof polo shirt?
3 posted on
04/20/2009 8:11:23 AM PDT by
Arguendo
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Tested against ballistic threats of ll and llA (equivalent to a .9MM or .357 Magnum), Let's put a few characters in bold and a bigger font.
Tested against ballistic threats of ll and llA (equivalent to a .9MM or .357 Magnum),
Not all that scared about the 0.9mm ammo. The .357 yes, but not to worried about under 1 mm ammo.
4 posted on
04/20/2009 8:12:57 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(No free man bows to a foreign king.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wonder how it would fare against my 460 S&W Magnum.
5 posted on
04/20/2009 8:13:05 AM PDT by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Also let us not forget the good old .22 will get through the weave and hit it’s target. It may not kill right a way but it will hurt like heck & the bullet may bounce around inside the target doing lots of damage as well.
9 posted on
04/20/2009 8:26:47 AM PDT by
TMSuchman
(I'll heat up & bring the tar, you bring the feathers & we'll meet in DC!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson