1. Sorry, People ! I said “Robertson” instead of ROBERTS.
(Old age.)
2.”The bottom line is that Hemenway blistered Robertson with criticism, and demanded the right of discovery ( of Obama’s BC ), and Robertson meekly backed down. His bluff was called and he folded.”
I read through the order 3 times, and didn’t see one word about Roberts “backing down”;nor did I see any reference to blistering criticism.
I DID see he chose to issue a simple reprimand as the sole sanction - citing Atty. Hemenway’s age and long, honorable service.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=92149
“And now you’ve heard the rest of the story!”
Paul Harvey
Did you read Mr. Hemenway’s Show of Cause? I would suggest reading the Supplemental Show of Cause as well.
The judge was basically faced with backing down or holding a hearing and granting discovery (i.e., forcing the defendant Soteoro/Obama to produce a certified birth certificate).. call it what you may, it’s backing down.
I am pleased Patriot Hemenway stood his ground. Judge Robertson had threatened him with serious financial sanctions, i.e., paying the legal fees of Obama and Biden. Instead, Judge Robertson instead issued a ‘reprimand.’ I’d call that backing down.
I’m completely confused. Are we talking about the Supreme Court’s Justice Roberts?