There is a very clear definition of ex parte communication that all judges, including the Supremes strictly adhere to. You don't think that this violates those guidelines? to
Obama recently visited all of the Supreme Court Justices except Alito while active Obama citizenship cases were on the docket. That's an Ex Parte violation.
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt (that's a big benefit) that this did indeed happen the way she described.
I give her the benefit more than a guy named Obama who has repeatedly lied. So what do we call an excessive liar?
that this did indeed happen the way she described. Is it not equally reasonable to presume that Roberts felt this woman could have been some kind of threat and diverted her attention to his security detail?
I sincerely doubt it. Oh please, you're reaching with fantasy.
No that's not a violation of anything. Did Obama discuss the case with any of the Justices? - no. It's a far cry from having a discussion with the plaintiff's attorney about the case while removed from the defendant's attorney. That is Ex Parte communication.