It's clear that this is starting to take its toll. She definitely needs more sleep.
This episode coupled with her Scalia claims from earlier in the week, make we wonder if she isn't in some kind of psychological distress.
Based upon her description, my impression is that she really was at the Scalia event. Scalia was plugging a book about how to make your case to judges and he probably responded to her questions in that light. It's not clear that Scalia was aware that she already had a case before the court. Of course that fact fits in with Taitz's theory that there is a conspiracy involving the court clerks.
As Taitz has made a number of errors of fact in her blog statements, I think I would tend to wonder if she quoted Scalia 100% correctly.
Yes, Scalia might answer a question the way he did if it was a general question about the court's procedures and policies. But, Ms. Taitz claims in her blog that she identified herself and referenced the case that she was party to and asked a specific question to Scalia about that specific case. In no reality would Scalia have any Ex Parte discussion with counsel for a case that is either before the court or will be coming before the court.
I suppose one could chalk up these mistakes to Ms. Taitz's "English as a second language" problem. But from where I sit, it's becoming increasingly difficult.