Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr

You said — “It was originally designed for this purpose only. The older SURTASS ships were monohulls.”

Quote from article — “The Impeccable is a minesweeper...”

Then why is it said to be a minesweeper.

They’re already reporting what it’s doing in using the sonar for detecting Chinese subs — so it makes no sense to report the ship as being a different kind of ship, saying a “minesweeper”... (in other words, I didn’t make up the designation... :-) ...)


54 posted on 03/09/2009 4:23:43 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler
Then why is it said to be a minesweeper.

Because the media knows jack about the military and sucks at research

In this case they typed USS Impeccable (It's a US navy ship, right?) unto google and came up with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Impeccable_(AM-320)

Whereas the correct query "USNS Impeccable" gives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USNS_Impeccable_(T-AGOS-23)

57 posted on 03/09/2009 5:31:42 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ( As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities. - D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

That part of the article is incorrect. Just do a search on the ship or on US minesweepers..


58 posted on 03/09/2009 5:37:10 PM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Star Traveler

I’m pretty sure that modern day minesweepers do not have metal hulls.


68 posted on 03/10/2009 6:33:36 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Dear Mr. Obama - Please make it rain candy! P.S. I like jelly beans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson