You said — “It was originally designed for this purpose only. The older SURTASS ships were monohulls.”
—
Quote from article — “The Impeccable is a minesweeper...”
Then why is it said to be a minesweeper.
They’re already reporting what it’s doing in using the sonar for detecting Chinese subs — so it makes no sense to report the ship as being a different kind of ship, saying a “minesweeper”... (in other words, I didn’t make up the designation... :-) ...)
Because the media knows jack about the military and sucks at research
In this case they typed USS Impeccable (It's a US navy ship, right?) unto google and came up with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Impeccable_(AM-320)
Whereas the correct query "USNS Impeccable" gives
That part of the article is incorrect. Just do a search on the ship or on US minesweepers..
I’m pretty sure that modern day minesweepers do not have metal hulls.