To: nysuperdoodle; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; ...
2 posted on
03/08/2009 8:52:00 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(Yo, Washingtonians, the American people called. They DEMAND their country back.)
To: nysuperdoodle; eeevil conservative
3 posted on
03/08/2009 8:53:16 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: nysuperdoodle
Scientists believe what they want to believe. They always seem to find the results that they expected, probably because they ignore data that don’t fit their expectations.
To: nysuperdoodle
But inevitably this provoked the question as to why quality control seemed to be so poor on one of the world's leading official sources of climate data that it had taken an outside observer to point out that something was wrong. The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters. 100% bullcrap.
6 posted on
03/08/2009 9:54:01 AM PDT by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
To: nysuperdoodle
Satellite Produces False Data Speaking of false data, how about this opportunity for the enviro-whackos to influence the numbers ...
NOAA Daily Weather Observer - As a volunteer weather observer you would maintain a weather station on your property and routinely provide (at least once daily) meteorological data, such as temperature, precipitation and snowfall.

7 posted on
03/08/2009 10:00:22 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: nysuperdoodle
Real science is hard against global warming, but the new McCarthy, Algore, and McCarthyist lackeys aren’t going to give up their scam. At least the real McCarthy had the benefit of being right. The new McCarthyism of global warming is 100 percent wrong, like most liberalism.
11 posted on
03/08/2009 11:00:09 AM PDT by
pallis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson