So on your planet, birth certificates are never admitted as evidence in paternity cases, only DNA evidence is ever admitted.
As for the rest, I provided a link, but apparently it was too much trouble for you to click on it.
And, predictably, you did not address my main points.
Too bad. I am still hoping for someone to point out some obvious flaws in my argument, but I guess you aren't that person.
Your main points were that the COLB is not enough to prove birth in Hawaii. I refuted that decisively.