[Michael Michael]

How about Sandra Ramsey Lines?

All Lines said is that you can't use a photograph or a scanned image of a paper document to authenticate the document itself. For that, you need to examine the actual paper document.

That's not the same as saying that the photographs or scanned image have been altered or manipulated.

[Beckwith]

All Lines said is that you can't use a photograph or a scanned image of a paper document to authenticate the document itself. For that, you need to examine the actual paper document.

That's not the same as saying that the photographs or scanned image have been altered or manipulated.

No, that's not what she said. She said -- “After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the Internet by the various groups, which include the ‘Daily Kos,’ the Obama Campaign, ‘Factcheck.org’ and others cannot be relied upon as genuine.”

And that is the issue at hand -- Obama's attorney's are using THAT EXACT scanned image as their evidence that Obama is eligible for the job.

Obama's attorney's even refer to it as a "birth certificate," which they know it's not.

Why do you think they are knowingly presenting false evidence to the court? Why do you think they are attempting to perpetrate a fraud on the court?

You have more opinions than most on this forum. Why do you think Obama is fighting the release of his bona fides with such vigor? What do you think he is hiding?