Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One person introducing a resolution that will be crushed in the legislature is hardly a civil war.


5 posted on 02/23/2009 9:57:05 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pabianice

Hey, it makes for great headlines!


7 posted on 02/23/2009 9:57:58 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

What if a person being procecuted under one of these “unconstitutiona” federal laws was to make that very argument.

What would be the counter argument?


12 posted on 02/23/2009 10:06:11 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I hate to quote Chairman Mao, but: “A journey of a thousand miles begins withe the first step.”


20 posted on 02/23/2009 10:14:57 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

“One person introducing a resolution that will be crushed in the legislature is hardly a civil war.”

It was four people out of a house of nearly 400. The Democrat dominated committee reported the bill as “Inexpedient to Legislate.”

It’s getting some good press, but no further action is pending at this time.


28 posted on 02/23/2009 10:45:58 AM PST by Poser (American-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
One person introducing a resolution that will be crushed in the legislature is hardly a civil war.

Actually, there are four sponsors to this legislation.

I, for one, am impressed anyone would propose such a resolution. Bring back Constitutionalism!

29 posted on 02/23/2009 10:53:17 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I wish more people would study the history of the last Civil War before they go about promoting the next one. The Civil War was the second of America’s great steps away from being a Free Republic - 1830, 1917, 1933 and 2009 being the others.

After the Civil War the country was never as free as it was before. Neither the states nor the people ever got all of the rights that they surrendered to the federal government during the war back. Corporate power increased greatly and the culture of corruption that evolved out of military procurement during the war paved the way for the age of the trusts. The effects of the war continued to divide our country along regional lines well into the 1970s.

The problem is that most wars don’t end in final victory but simmer along for years as bloody stalemates. Think in terms of The Irish Troubles (which lasted over 300 years, assuming they are really over) or the Mexican Caste Wars (1847 to 1901 with a flare up in 1993).

Wars also rarely resolve the problems that they are started to resolve. See the history of the War of 1812 and the present conflict in Iraq.

I’m all for reforming and disempowering the federal government but we need to exhaust all legal and peaceable means before we go talking about “firing the first shot” (what would have happened if the Confederates had not fired on Fort Sumter?) A civil war could last decades and leave our country unrecognizable and even less free than it is today.


37 posted on 02/23/2009 2:02:14 PM PST by InABunkerUnderSF (Be There >>> http://www.secondamendmentmarch.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson