Skip to comments.
CHU JUMPS IN 'DEEP END OF THE POOL'
MSNBC ^
| 2/20/2009
| John Yang
Posted on 02/21/2009 8:25:13 AM PST by curth
Edited on 02/21/2009 8:42:17 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: curth
Don’t worry, Gepetto is pulling all the strings for the next four years; if you still want to worry, find out who is pulling his.
21
posted on
02/21/2009 8:47:02 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: steelyourfaith
Chu-chu wreck.
22
posted on
02/21/2009 8:54:29 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: GoCards
No, this is the Obama era.
23
posted on
02/21/2009 8:57:35 AM PST
by
353FMG
(Trust in Glock.)
To: curth
"I'm not the administration," the Cabinet secretary replied. "I will be speaking and learning more about this in order to figure out what the U.S. position should be and what the president's position is." This is incompetent.
We have a energy secretary against energy, a commerce secretary against commerce, and a secretary of homeland security against security. WTF????
To: Old Professer
25
posted on
02/21/2009 9:04:45 AM PST
by
Foolsgold
("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
To: curth
The day before, reporters asked him about OPEC output levels after a speech to a group of utility regulators. He responded that the issue was "not in my domain." Chu is not the master of his domain!
26
posted on
02/21/2009 9:09:47 AM PST
by
6SJ7
(Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
To: aruanan
I heard him talk here at the U of Chicago. He was very entertaining. But the problem is when he and others like him think their extremely specific brilliance extends generally to everything else. That attitude is only justified in the case of FReepers.
Cheers1
27
posted on
02/21/2009 9:33:02 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: curth
Why do we need a Dept. of Energy again?
28
posted on
02/21/2009 9:35:48 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: aruanan
I heard him talk here at the U of Chicago. He was very entertaining. But the problem is when he and others like him think their extremely specific brilliance extends generally to everything else. An expert, and most Ph.Ds, know a great deal about very little. I prefer those who know a little about a lot of different things and know where to go to get specific information on subjects when necessary.
29
posted on
02/21/2009 9:36:39 AM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: Common Sense 101
30
posted on
02/21/2009 9:42:29 AM PST
by
Niuhuru
(Fine, here's my gun, but let me give you the bullets first. I'll send them to you through the barrel)
To: Niuhuru
More like Delusions of Competence.
31
posted on
02/21/2009 9:48:35 AM PST
by
SAJ
To: Common Sense 101
They think they are the smartest, because trainable people are taught to have exaggerated, positive self-esteems. This administration is made up of black and white trainable humans.
32
posted on
02/21/2009 11:16:56 AM PST
by
abclily
To: curth
I dont really see what the problem is here,the Congress passes a spending Bill Of a Trillion Dollars without reading it , The President appoints a Guy to the energy dept. who Knows nothing about the main source of Energy that drives are once thriving Republic ,he appoints an individual to Run the IRS who doesnt pay his taxes,a Commerce Secretary who stays as long as it takes before the coffee gets cold,An EPA commissioner who is about to Make Carbon Dioxide a Regulated Gas which will force those that are about to build clean burning coal factories to cancel them or go Bankrupt,not bad except it is coal where we get 50 percent of our electricity,WHATS THE PROBLEM?
Unless of course you enjoy talk Radio Or Going on the Internet or Driving your car without a monitoring device along for the ride.
To: Foolsgold
34
posted on
02/21/2009 1:32:35 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson