Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RIRed

And who is going to challenge this blatant violation? Just like his eligibility to even by president? Is that what is going to happen here??

OK Repubs — here is your chance.


3 posted on 02/20/2009 3:33:05 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EagleUSA

In 1978, a constitutional amendment was approved by Congress and sent to the states, which would have given DC congressional representation. At that time, the Democrats realized that they needed a constitutional amendment to accomplish this goal.

That amendment was not ratified by anywhere near the 38 states needed. But now in 2009, Democrats are saying that only a regular statute law is needed to give DC representation.

If this goal needed an amendment then, doesn’t it still need an amendment now????

Nothing in the legal status of DC as a federal district has changed between 1978 and 2009.


4 posted on 02/20/2009 3:43:10 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson