On the tv interview the other night, she said she didn’t. They also reported that only ONE child had special needs—he has autism, IIRC.
Seems like the facts on this story keep changing with every article! FWIW, I don’t agree with what she did, by any means.
I don’t want to see everyone who goes through IVF to have a family be discriminated against because of her actions though.
(If you can’t tell, I only achieved motherhood through the grace of God and a wonderful fertility specialist and 6 IVFs which are truth be told, crapshoots, because there’s NO guarantees of a live child after going through IVF!)
She lied, which, I think, isn’t that surprising. Her publicist stated that her viewpoints as to what qualifies as welfare is perhaps different from others. How she’s paying for this publicist, though, is yet another question that has yet to be answered.