You exude far more smugness than thoughtfulness. I think correct response to your list is: And your point is what? What does Heimlich have to do at all with the topic? Furthermore, what kind of idle or untrained mind could sit around attaching him and his technique to a debate on the origin of existence.
I don't even have a strong opinion on the topic. But if you were doing high fives with yourself as you wrote this list, you are a bit deluded about it's coherence, it's effectiveness, and how smart you think it makes you look.
What does the
origin of existence have to do with evolution?
Heimlich and his technique are quite pertinent to the question of evolution.