Posted on 01/27/2009 10:55:49 AM PST by DissidentDingo
Its the “National” part.
Loving your country and (Western) culture is repulsive to International Socialists. Its so “reactionary” and “counter-revolutionary.”
The Socialists don’t really have any problems with rest of the Nazi agenda, though.
Thanks!
For what it is worth, imo...
The communist has the slave/worship retard mentality. He believes in the perfect farm made of pieces, but only get a monstrous piece, and not a whole, as a result. He is about being in “the farm benefit” rather than seeing the house as an instrument for a prescient project of its original builder - now dishonored and unconsulted. It’s a time suspended form of existence, none before and none advance after should matter. It’s very close to existentialism of Camus or Gramsci (the former used it as a personal philosophy and the latter as a cultural phenomenum).
The socialist is usualy a spoiled kid of the rich who has no right to inheritance but wants supports of all kinds from “friends” around.
I think National Socialists were closer to Communist Socialist hybrid. Hitler used National as a word so as to keep domestic elites to work on his war machine. Goebbels called on the “thinking German worker” to forget communists and socialists because of their infighting. Hitler wanted a machine (communism) and benefits (socialism).
Marxists use ideology only as a mean. Marx wanted plain dictatorship and did not believe in his own ideas. It were a devious ploy for his own aggrandisement.
Lenine sounded off with “Power to the Soviets” and betrayed Russia to the Kaiser. Leninism is a selfdelusional empowerment doctrine for a “runaway bride” like political prostitute. It used the stealthing language of Marx to build secrecy and coded languages in the open. Much of Political Correctness manipulation and feminism lie around that nucleus of existentialist crisis of exercise in self persuasion and perception based “confidence” - worship of worship seekers cult. Leninism is the sort of engine behind the whole phenomenum and uses a comprehensive set of methods and “negative philosophies”.
Humanism is simply theft. Whereas repent who drive one to admit mistakes and needing checks and balances, the humanist “moves on” and still retains full selfrighteous powers after destruction is done. It’s more of a premeditative self excusing brand. Lenine was a lawyer and used law so as to work around it before commiting the crime for which he could eventually be caught for. It ultimately made criminality and raw political “pushing” the acceptable culture for a preset friendly court for his own kinds.
I’ve been posting about The Frankfurt School here for years. I don’t understand why its history and influence is so ignored by FReepers and conservatives.
http://www.colony14.net/id41.html
http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=91800&Disp=5&Trace=on
The Frankfurt School has been insidious in expanding it's ideology to America. It has stealthily become so pan optic, it is now the norm. I believe this explains the lack of attention it has received. We are surrounded by it. It is no longer an aberrancy. The following article from 2007 was one of the better ones I read. It does an excellent job of relating it to present day consequences.
"In a scant sixty years we have gone from the can-do Greatest Generation, tempered by economic depression and tested by war, to a self-loathing white-guilt-ridden can't-get-it-done culture that infects today's college campuses, mainstream media, and, most depressing, many of our elected representatives.
The roots of this phenomenon can be traced to a little known movement transplanted from 1930's Germany to the United States called the Frankfurt School. The principle advocates were Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Walter Benjamin."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.