[mnehring]

Those are parts of Sharia law. To them, all I mentioned is law.. this may be where this entire thread is getting off track. I can see you are specifically wanting to ban much of what is contained in al-mu'amalat and 'uqubat, however, those are just part of the law*. For those of us who are discussing freedom, we are talking about the entire blanket of Sharia law.

*I think the other way we are being thrown is the term law. We are not talking about writing in the books a legal requirement to follow Sharia, the term 'law' in this case is like how many Christians follow the Noahadic laws, not as a legal definition regulation, but as personal guidelines.

I understand where you are coming from, you don't want the US legal system to adopt the requirement that Sharia law ('law' as in criminal or judicial standards) be required. Most people here are talking about the personal practice of the parts of Sharia law ('law' as in a personal morality) that are part of normal, individual freedoms.

We all are basically talking about two entirely different aspects of this.

[Islaminaction]

I do not care what Muslims are doing in their own homes, this is more than that. This is part of the their takeover plan, along with the alcohol and Christmas ban. If they want sharia banking let them move to an Islamic country. They did not need it all this time, but now they see us a politically correct and weak.

Gotta run, have a good one.