“I would ask why a court has not agreed with you?”
The court also said the local governments can take your property for any reason they so choose and sell it to whomever they desire. So much for the courts obeying the Constitution or the foundations of this nation.
The courts did not rule Obama was a US citizen. They simply ruled no one has standing to demand he prove it.
Fine, let’s get Arnold in as simply lie and swear he is eligible. According to you that is all that is required, which is completely false. The Constitution does not say, “Well, screw the natural born thing. Just get a few people to swear to it.”
You said — “The court also said the local governments can take your property for any reason they so choose and sell it to whomever they desire. So much for the courts obeying the Constitution or the foundations of this nation.”
When courts give a decision based upon the law, as they read it, for that particular court case — then — the people have the ability to change the law to make it so that the court cannot do that again. All it takes is changing the law so that the court cannot come up with that decision the next time.
—
And then — “Fine, let’s get Arnold in as simply lie and swear he is eligible. According to you that is all that is required, which is completely false. The Constitution does not say, “Well, screw the natural born thing. Just get a few people to swear to it.”
The problem is that no one could come up with proof to show that Obama was lying. That wouldn’t be the case with Arnold Schwarzenegger. He’s got the evidence all over the place that he’s not qualified. He couldn’t get past that point, no matter if he swore to it and his whole campaign committee swore to it.