“Nobody has produced any proof that Obama is not legally qualified.”
They most certainly have... don’t you read?
But beside that FACT, Article II Section I makes it incumbent upon the candidate to prove his/her Constitutional eligibility for the office they seek. The burden of proof is upon the candidate, not the naysayer.
If nobody asks the question, it is assumed. But many have asked the question, which means in this case, eligibility is in doubt, at which point, it is the duty of the candidate to lay all doubts to rest.
Instead of doing that, he has spent a million bucks running from the question. People who hide things usually have something to hide.
He has spent a million bucks to avoid delivering a $10.00 certified copy of his birth records. And you see no reason to doubt?
No, they haven't. Yes I read. The trick is not believing everything you read. Especially when it is either in the New York Times, or just some guy on the internet.
"He has spent a million bucks to avoid delivering a $10.00 certified copy of his birth records."
Ah, another of things you read on the internet. Got any proof of this?