Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Snowball's Chance in Hell: Will Couric Do Another Interview With Palin on Global Warming
It's A Kwazy Life ^ | January 11th, 2009 | Tom Lamb

Posted on 01/11/2009 9:49:09 PM PST by earmarksrus

I as I write this, I look outside and think where are the man-made global warming theorists right now?

Are they sitting in some cozy location thinking of ways to cover their butts on new data that contradicts the theory that oceans will rise, the gates of weather hell will be unleashed and we will all be wearing some triple numbered SPF lotion?

What is interesting is a new study that came out and was published in Science on January 2nd, 2009, has not made the rounds in the media.

The meat of the study:

A paper published by Science on 2 January 2009 (Bao et al., 2009) is the latest and perhaps most significant development in Ian Fairchild’s collaborative research over the past 30 years on Precambrian ice ages and their associated carbonate rocks. The paper comes up with a new line of evidence to support a key, but counter-intuitive prediction of Snowball Earth theory: that carbon dioxide levels were high in the Earth’s atmosphere during an ancient ice age. During a Snowball event you can think of the Earth as being like a baked Alaska pudding – hot on the outside surrounding a cold middle (ice-cream in the case of the pudding). This strange situation arises if the Earth is largely covered in ice and snow in contact with an atmosphere rich in greenhouse gases in which heat is trapped. The covering of ice and snow stops rocks being weathered by carbon dioxide: weathering is the key process that uses up this gas which is continuously released into the atmosphere from volcanoes. So, during an extreme glaciation (probably triggered by low levels of greenhouse gas in the first place), levels of carbon dioxide progressively rose to unusually high levels (Hoffman et al., 1998).

Where is Katie Couric going back for a third interview with Sarah Palin and asking Palin what did she mean that Palin didn't think global warming is man made. Or the main cause.

Never mind what she read Katie, it is evident Palin read somewhere, something that made Palin believe global warming wasn't man-made and that there are cycles in weather patterns.

It is safe to say that, Palin didn't read it in the New York Times, The Los Angeles Times or see it talked about on MSNBC or by Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann.

By the way, someone should ask Couric and Olbermann et al, what do they read?

Do you think Katie will go back and say to Sarah Palin, you may be on to something?

Well, reasonable and intelligent people would say, "in a snowball's chance in hell" Katie Couric would go back. Because reasonable and intelligent people know that quite frankly, Katie Couric doesn't run with their pack.

And what about climate change?

This discovery is of general interest for two reasons. Firstly, there is a fascination with extreme events in the history of our planet. It is proposed that a small number of Snowball Earth events of near-global or total glaciation of the planet occurred: if so they certainly represent one of the major challenges to survival of life on the planet. This was the reason that Channel 4 chose this topic for one of the programmes in their recent series called Catastrophe. The concepts behind Snowball Earth are accessibly described at the website of Paul Hoffman, who has been a major advocate for it: http://www.snowballearth.org/. A key part of the theory is that once snow and ice cover all the higher latitudes, the glaciation would go out of control because of a runaway positive feedback between the growth of a reflective white surface of ice and snow (i.e. high albedo) and cooling of the surface. Modelling shows that a stable state would be reached with the Earth close to -45�C (compared with +15�C) today. A weak hydrological cycle (with a little melting and evaporation in summer) would eventually create moving glaciers kilometres thick. However, many geologists think that although the Earth may have been significantly covered with ice, it did not freeze-up completely � they find open marine deposits sandwiched between glacial deposits (reviewed by Allen and Etienne, 2008). Some modellers find that a stable climate state could exist with a mean Earth temperature around zero and significant open water in the tropics: this has been termed Slushball Earth: still an extremely inhospitable place from a human perspective! A carbon dioxide atmosphere would also have built up in this case since weathering would still have been inhibited.

The earth would be an inhospitable place from a human perspective. That would be the earth's "Snowball Events."

Thus there is a snowball's chance in hell that the man-made global warming believers would believe in scientific data that contradicts them.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bigmoney; cashcow; climatecycles; globalmarshallplan; globalwarming; katietheclown; palin

1 posted on 01/11/2009 9:49:09 PM PST by earmarksrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus

I would hope Palin is a hell of a lot smarter than McCain’s campaign people were. Don’t give Couric the time of day!!


2 posted on 01/11/2009 10:07:06 PM PST by sadiebella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus

Hey Katie, you’re not the center of our universe, LOL (approximation of Palin quote).


3 posted on 01/11/2009 10:11:41 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus

4 posted on 01/11/2009 10:15:08 PM PST by Gitche Gumee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sadiebella

My definition of a religion is when a belief does not allow for an alternative way of looking at a situation. To the Lefties, under this definition, global warming is a religion. For Sarah Palin global is a scientific possibility that requires proof to make it a viable scientific theory. Under this criteria the supposed rigid right-wing relgious fanatic, Sarah Palin, doesn’t necessarily dismiss global warming as total bunk but she states that it is NOT the main cause for changing weather patterns, that weather is cyclical and always has been. This is a very reasonable secular position that somehow the Lefties who promote secular intellectual thought choose not to accept. Irony, to the nth degree.


5 posted on 01/11/2009 10:16:18 PM PST by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus

It’s Climate Change now. That way they have it covered, it’s colder, see we told you the climate was going to change, it’s warmer, see we told you the climate was going to change. I remember back about 1970 when the environmental movement started, the hysteria then was that we were going to have another ice age. Visions of wooly mammoths charging through the neighborhood filled my head. Then it warmed up, stabilized for awhile, then got warmer for about 10 years, and now it’s cooling off again for the last 4 years. Climate runs in cycles no matter what that blowhard Al Gore sas.


6 posted on 01/11/2009 10:36:13 PM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus

Ping!
www.teamsarah.org


7 posted on 01/11/2009 10:40:44 PM PST by LinnKeyes2000 (Palin/Jindal2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

I told my friends here in Chicago that this would be a rough winter because the summer was so cool. There is over a foot of snow on the ground (as there was most of December) and a hard freeze is coming with below zero temps again. We are starting to pray to the weather gods for warmth.


8 posted on 01/11/2009 10:45:00 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sadiebella
Somewhere I read that Palin should not have questioned the RNC's agenda to have her appear on Couric's program two more times. She had every right to disagree with their agenda!

Couric is a liberal and she was out to get Sarah Palin. McCain's people made a mistake.

Without Palin on the ticket, McCain had no hope of winning, IMO.

9 posted on 01/11/2009 10:57:01 PM PST by IIntense (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: euram
It’s Climate Change now. That way they have it covered, it’s colder, see we told you the climate was going to change, it’s warmer, see we told you the climate was going to change.

Climate changes because the Government hasn't been given enough power

10 posted on 01/11/2009 11:12:14 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false face for the urge to rule." - H L Mencken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus; calcowgirl; Horusra; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

11 posted on 01/12/2009 3:49:56 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earmarksrus
Katie has to check with the Obama administration first and then she will let us know.
12 posted on 01/12/2009 5:34:56 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson