Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JudyinCanada
I said the reporter knew he was playing with fire (that would be the agitated individual). you disagreed.

It's my contention that anyone who lives in a city learns, sooner or later, to give lots of wiggle room to agitated people.

If you speak to them like that reporter did, you're asking for it -- muslim or no, as temporary insanity doesn't recognize creed. All the more if you're aiming a camera at an agitated person in a large crowd of agitated people.

33 posted on 01/07/2009 6:38:32 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (revolution is in the air.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: the invisib1e hand

Gotcha.

I didn’t think the reporter sounded that antagonistic, although he was asking a pretty leading question.

I have seen a number of protests, but it seems to me that the anger levels are much higher in these. I realize that anger happens in every “creed”, but I think reaction and the handling of anger depends on a lot more. I believe that radical islam espouses some pretty violent ways of dealing with infidels, especially Jews. To allow these two groups to stand across the street from each other is just asking for trouble, given the pure hatred which has brewed in the Hamas supporters for years.

I would hate to see some violence break out, and wind up with, God forbid, a beheading or something. It’s not that far-fetched - their “holy” book instructs them as such. Who knows when one of them could cross that line and act on it.


35 posted on 01/07/2009 6:47:08 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson