His "analysis" is as bogus as his name and PhD and has been debunked for a while now.
Actually, it hasn’t. And, the beginning of this thread has affidavits. What do you have in the way of substantiation? Or are you just parroting someone else?
His “analysis” is as bogus as his name and PhD and has been debunked for a while now.
***Did you even bother to read this thread? If what you say is true, then by all means submit your own affidavit to the SCOTUS in Keyes v Lingle and Berg v Obama and you’ll be the big troll hero.
Yeah, Polarik and Berg who wants to indict Bush/Cheney are not people I would associate myself with.