[[The pattern is consistent with common descent in that highly functional sequences show high conservation between species and sequences of little or no use change at a predictable rate. As such the data is unmistakable for common descent.]]
Lol- then explain the billions of differences in what’s left over EVEN if we were to be generous and state that we’re 95% similar (Some scientists are now admittign it’s not nearly this high, and that previous claims were made with full knowledge that we weren’t as ‘similar’ as they said)
The billions of differences is osmethign that no evolutionist likes to touch, because hte plain fact is that it is htese differences that seperate us, and htey can certainly not be explained in the ‘few million years’ that evos claim the two species diverged. As well, it’s still biologically impossible for htese differences to have occured- and no amount of time would cure that I’m afriad.
Humans and chimps are about 2% different in their genetic DNA and about 6% different in their genomic DNA. The 2% genetic difference is a direct measure, comparing gene to gene, your “previous claims were made with full knowledge that we weren't as ‘similar’ as they said” is total bovine excrement. The gene differences are still 2% and you can go check the sequences yourself, they are online. The 6% figure was unavailable and unknown until the respective genomes of humans and chimps were sequenced, although it was expected that it would be higher than the 2% genetic difference over the entire genome, because evolutionary scientists know that non genetic regions are more variable than genetic regions.