[[So, it’s pretty much the consensus that the folks at FR have debunked modern scientific thought?]]
All of science? Of course not
[[Why is it that it hasn’t convinced the scientific community or society at large?]]
Golly, Adent devotion to somethign htey’ve invested their careers and reputaitons in comes to mind?
[[Science thrives on being challenged and changing its theories to incorporate new facts.]]
No sir it doesn’t- not when it comes to naturalism- to state otherwise is to display a blatant disregard for the obvious.
[[ So, if you think you’ve won the argument, there isn’t any proof of it.]]
We have, it’s just a few holdouts who are also apparently deeply invested in naturalism that don’t care to confess the obvious.
Well, here’s a clue. If you had won, evolutionists would be suing today to get it taught in the classroom.
Museums of Natural History would be changing their exhibits, putting all those fake dinosaur bones in the warehouse, or better yet, crushing them.
Oil companies would no longer explore for hydrocarbons based on the ages of the rocks and what organic material would have existed at the time. They’d just ask God where he put the stuff.
Of course, if that worked, it’s not clear why the oil isn’t primarily located in the Christian nations and Israel, is it?
You haven’t lost the argument entirely, but you’re losing it more and more every year. You can claim you’re winning, but that’s not what the scoreboard says.