[Fawn]

There's no need for me to answer that because i know what your answers will be to whatever I answer. You will just point to and quote other sources.
I wish you would just give me your individual common sense logical belief and not lean on other sources. But I see you can't do that....

[Mr. Silverback]

There's no need for me to answer that because i know what your answers will be to whatever I answer. You will just point to and quote other sources. I wish you would just give me your individual common sense logical belief and not lean on other sources. But I see you can't do that....

Ah, so now your belief in Darwinism makes you a psychic.

Now, let me get this straight: You're demanding that I commment on a historical event without using any source other than my own thoughts. That's ludicrous in and of itself unless I was present for the historical event. But does that mean you're going to adopt the same standard? If you're going to comment on evolution without using any research other than what feelings you have, wouldn't you have to be such an expert in the field that you'd make Stephen Jay Gould and Carl Sagan loook like kindergarteners?

Sorry, but I don't buy the intellectual superiority bit. You're hiding under your desk over a simple question, another intellectual lightweight who thinks a mocking tone is proof enough. Anaswer the question: Are you a Christian?