Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: schaef21

Common sense.


1,384 posted on 01/12/2009 10:39:47 AM PST by Fawn (~~~~~~~~~~~~~~24~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies ]


To: Fawn

I’m not trying to be harsh here, Fawn. Merely asking....Do you consider that a legitimate answer or were you being flippant?

Here’s a couple more questions based on the answers you’ve given:

Do you believe the Biblical account right up until the “primordial muck”.....then not after that? You seem to be taking half of your belief system from the Bible and the other half from secular science.

Let me posit this to you....something I read on a blog a while back that I thought was an interesting take. You can make four statements about matter, of which only one can be true:

1. Matter does not exist.
2. Matter is eternal.
3. Matter sprang up on it’s own from nothing.
4. Matter was created.

One of these statements has to be true....none of these statements can be proven scientifically and therefore must all be considered philosophical.

Secular science books teach number 3. Does a philosophical construct have a place in a science text book?

Just askin’.


1,394 posted on 01/13/2009 8:30:57 PM PST by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1384 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson