Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
What was asked was whether I had any doubt that they have a certain point of view, and that view being expressed in ambiguous terms that have resisted being defined. That is a substantially different proposition.

I think the idea of authority in this context was defined very well by me, but it didn't fit with your idea that to believe these folks are into scientism is the same as creating and baptizing them into a religion.

But OK, we'll play it your way: Is it warranted to believe that a person who says weakening the "nightmare" hold of religion would be the greatest thing scientists have ever done is a believer in scientism?

1,364 posted on 01/11/2009 6:41:24 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
Is it warranted to believe that a person who says weakening the "nightmare" hold of religion would be the greatest thing scientists have ever done is a believer in scientism?

Not necessarily. I've met at least one person who's bitter about religion in general for reasons that have nothing to do with science or "scientism".

1,365 posted on 01/11/2009 6:49:34 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson