Every statement in this is false.
Evolution is a fact that has been demonstrated in the laboratory, as well as in the natural world.
The theory of evolution seeks to explain the facts of evolution.
Many scientists, by evidence accept that man evolved and was not created in current human form.
Science does not deal in proof. Science deals in increasingly accurate explanations. No theory in science has been, or can be, proved.
Science does not require laboratory testing or star formation would be beyond science. Your view of what is and is not required in science is incorrect.
And finally, your claim that evolution is not a science, but religion, is simply wrong. Religion relies on scripture and revelation, and accepts its conclusions without evidence or the need for testing. Science is based on facts and theories which seek to explain those facts, and is constantly undergoing testing and retesting.
Here’s a “nifty” question for Evolutionists...With every “Leap Forward” on the Evolutionary ladder, the arising Life Form needed a more complex Protein and Nutritional chain in order to survive, let alone thrive. Since this would involve the “fine-tuning” of the entire environment, how we accept that this PRE-EVOLUTION EVOLVING could transpire successfully thousands of times su the ecosystem would be ready to support the newly arisen form?
Is that true?
Evolution is a fact
Is that the truth?
Science does not deal in proof.
Is that true?
No theory in science has been, or can be, proved.
Is anything you say about evolution true?