What physical process required by evolution is barred by the 2nd Law? Be specific about the chemistry.
[[What physical process required by evolution is barred by the 2nd Law? Be specific about the chemistry.]]
you know, Coyoteman tried to argue this argument, and I warned him about looking foolish, and I’ve now informed you that you’ll come across lookign foolish too- but evidently, you wqnt to continue?
As you know, Chemical reactions require enery/heat loss, and continued energy input, and hte resulting heat loss contributes to the breakdown of systems. The absolutely ecessary additions of information also contribute to increased entropy- Everytime you add, you up the requirements needed to maintain a system, resulting in more energy expended. Every system that we nkow of is subject to these basic scientific facts. You can look these chemical degredations yourself online- it’s a fact- Without an engine- heat flow is useless- once you add the engine, the wear and tear imemdiately begin to affect the whole system. If you’re demanding the biological chemical reactions, again, You’ll find htose online, but briefly, you add any energy, the system uptakes htis energy, converts it, which takes more eenergy, and turns it to fuel which is burned which inturn causes degredation throughout hte whole system (You can research ATP if you’re so interested in findign out hte precise mechanisms- which you will discover utilizing an amazing maount of energy which has detrimental effects on the system as a whole)
I’m being serious when I state that the argument for Macroevolution concerning the effects of hte second law is a dead end argument- nothign escapes the law except for a few moot- irrelevent and static non livign systems- Macroevolution however demands that hte law be ignroed while the single cell works it’s way al lthe way up to completed highly complex species- all in some miraculous self-organizing manner without any infromation available- which it MUST have just ‘created as it went along’ out of nowhere