If it produces reliable results, then I think it's probably good methodology. Does it?
You guys use it all the time when you apply it to the Bible.
Who are "you guys", and where did "we" say that the Bible has to be interpreted as being either totally literal or totally metaphorical?
How many times does some someone claim that they believe the creation account as written and they’re accused by the evos of being *Bible literalists*? And you’ve never seen it?
Sorry, not buying today, or ever.....