what is “that”?
Didn’t I answer the question that we should teach logic instead?
What you just posted on the reliabliity of science and scientific evidence. That's post #1054, on this thread. I realize I didn't copy and past the entire post in my reply. The forum software conveniently places the number of the post that was replied to at the bottom of reply post (right next to the word "To"), and even takes you right to that post if you click on the link so that you can review it if you don't understand the context of the reply.
Didn’t I answer the question that we should teach logic instead?
I'm not sure. Where was that question asked, and what are we teaching it instead of? Was your post (#1054) an example of the logic you think we should be teaching them?