The thread began with a discussion of what is being taught in the classroom. I admit mixing several threads together -- the same people generally post on all evolution threads -- but this thread started with this:
Liberals, who are quite often atheists, have long been in control of our media and our educational institutions, and they fiercely punish anyone who would depart from a vigorous defense of Darwinism...
Since it equates "Darwinists" with atheists, I have to assume that the alternative to evolution is some kind of theistic account.
I think it is reasonable to ask what a theist would teach in biology class that is different from what biologists would teach.
[[ I have to assume that the alternative to evolution is some kind of theistic account.
I think it is reasonable to ask what a theist would teach in biology class that is different from what biologists would teach.]]
Theistic? Says who? The truth can be taught without inferring who the causation is- some ID folks still believe the intelligent Causation is still nature, heck soem still beleive that common descent is true- but again, this goes beyond the truth, the facts and the evidence- I suggested earlier how ID can and should be taught minus the subjectiveness one way or hte other- There are biological truths that simply are NOT making it into our classrooms because they refute what has been taught for a very long time now (Under penalty of law if anythign but naturalistic Darwinism is taught)