To: Bill Dupray
I don’t see how any of the “problems” posed in the article are essentially bad. I’d rather have cops fighting real criminals than going after potheads who are otherwise committing no real crimes.
2 posted on
01/03/2009 6:57:19 PM PST by
pnh102
(Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
To: pnh102
“I’d rather have cops fighting real criminals than going after potheads who are otherwise committing no real crimes.”
I see your point but the guy those two border agents are in jail for shooting was smuggling pot.
Pot is not a victimless crime.
7 posted on
01/03/2009 7:00:37 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: pnh102
You won’t get that either in Massachusetts. They decriminalized murder a very long time ago.
24 posted on
01/03/2009 7:15:17 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: pnh102
I’d rather have cops fighting real criminals than going after potheads who are otherwise committing no real crimes. Which really isn't the case. Pot arrests usually come after someone is stopped for breaking some other law.
25 posted on
01/03/2009 7:17:31 PM PST by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: pnh102
I understand the theory of "gateway" drug but I also recognize that possession of an "individual user" amount of a recreational drug is not where I want my police force focused. Holy sheep dip, do we NOT have more pressing issues to address???
45 posted on
01/03/2009 7:36:37 PM PST by
DesertSapper
(God, Family, Country . . . . . . . . . . and dead terrorists!!!)
To: pnh102
Or how to support the Mexican drug lords real smart!
83 posted on
01/04/2009 6:45:57 AM PST by
Vaduz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson