“So, what you’re saying is that you’re sexist. No offense, but what you call “high standards,” I call a tall order of grumpy contrarian with a dollop of “holier than thou” snobbery on top.”
No, I’m not “sexist” but if it makes you FEEL BETTER, then you go on and believe that.
Being there for your kids is not “sexist”. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the concept of raising your own kids, knowing their friends and knowing what they are doing. It’s also a VALUES issue. So if you FEEL that having kids before marriage, not raising your kids, being there for them and knowing what your kids are doing makes me “holier than thou” - LOL. Guess I don’t share your “values” or beliefs. By all means support what makes you FEEL BETTER.
“Everyone seems to conveniently forget that Todd Palin has voluntarily taken the lead in doing some of the “mommy tasks” in the Palin family. That is what makes them a family. One picks up the other where needed.”
Yes, gender switching has worked out well for him - especailly Bristol. Will he also ve preparing her for child birth too? Yes, LIBERAL FAMILY VALUES is definitely for YOU!
““One of them” is around to care for the children. I think it bothers you that in the Palin household, it may be daddy slightly more than mama.”
Yes, I noticed .... LOL!!! No your screwed up roles an dlack of Christian values and beliefs concern me. You’d fit in better with a bunch of liberals - they have the same outlook as YOU!
‘As for Bristol, that is truly a case of “life happens.” If she and Levi make a good life together and care for their son, than it’s clearly a “no harm, no foul” situation. They seem to be trying their best to make the best of the situation - why condemn them? “
Oh, so screwing around is now “life happens”. The problem is we have more than enough of SINGLE KIDS having babies. Maybe you haven’t noticed that in your liberal value filled world. The stats for these kids lasting in a marriage are devestating. So we’ll have more divorces. I’m sure that will make you happy too. The economics of single moms raising their kids is nearly guaranteed to have a life of poverty. Nah don’t want to condemn that - why that might rock your little world.
YOu vote for Sarah and Plain family “values”.
We’ll stick with conservitative Christian family values because they are BETTER. Yes, our values/beliefs are SUPERIOR to the crap you defend. We don’t want YOU LIBERAL, CONFUSED FAMILY VALUES - they aren’t good enough for us. Your LIBERAL family “values” are what is destroying our country. Ponder that.
Of all the conservatives you come up with, you come up with Jindal (who you probably don't know much about other than the MSM’s pitching him as an alternative to Sarah), and Bret Schundler of all people.
Talk about the way-back machine. No offense to old Bret, but the guy is trying to relaunch his career by being elected mayor of Jersey City. He's not in the same universe as Sarah.
(Did you know that Bret Schundler worked for noted womanizer Gary Hart in ‘84? Burn him at the stake! Oooh, Ronald Reagan got along terribly with his kids and (gasp!) got a divorce! Devil!!)
Is there any woman in government at any level you don't have a problem with? Name one. You'd probably have a problem with Congresswoman Bachmann, probably one of the best conservatives going. She's absolutely charming and sharp as can be and another one who doesn't deserve half the junk sent her way by the liberals.
See, real conservatives don't care if you're a man or woman, white or black, rich or poor.
Sarah not having Christian values. That's a good one, too. Maniacs try to burn her church to the ground, maybe to punish her for her religious extremism, possibly killing some folks in the process, but she's not Christian enough for you. Don't make me laugh.
The record shows you're an irrational hater, no better than likes of Andrew Sullivan or Kathleen Parker. Admit it and move on.
And I am in no "Palin cult" religion, but you are definately in the "Hate Palin cult" though.