There’s no point. Why would we want to negotiate down to their level ? The only thing to discuss is less retrictive laws which I’m sure is not their objective. Of course now Hussein will use something out of the Alinsky playbook like “see they don’t want to cooporate”. As far as I’m concerned the 2nd Amendment settles everything, anything else is tyranny.
I see he’s using the old “Your seat at the table” unity them.
In his campaign e-mails, there was a recent effort in getting member subscribers to his barackobama.com website to have “house meetings”. It was encouraged that you invite or “recruit” whoever you can to these meetings to talk about team agendas for your area.
It normally wouldn’t be a bad idea, but you know Obama is Marxist. It means, he and his administration will have the final say anyway. You will be led to believe you have a “voice” in the process, but would you really?
It also encompasses the group model as opposed to individualism.
Then, there is that old strategy of “pose as a friend, but be a spy”.
Actions speak louder than words. Actions define character. What are Obama’s actions really indicating? Unity or dictatorship?
Didn’t other dictatorial types start doing these things first or not?