Somebody pass me a barf bag...
See the article as it was first written, in...
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/dear-la-times-looks-like-schwarzenegger.html
...as well as seeing Investigating Obama’s email letter to the Los Angeles Times.
If I were the risk manager for the LA TIMES I would have pulled the article too. There is the chance that Obama is what he says he is (yeah, I know...) in which case the paper may be exposing itself to the risk of lawsuit with that particular article.
1) The Advertiser birth announcement proves Obama was born in Hawaii;
2) Hillary would have used the birth certificate if the stories were true;
3) Obama doesn't have to produce the "vault" version because, more Gore words, there is no controlling legal authority; and
4) The courts have denied every case.
Number 4) first, I believe the rejections have all been procedural related; to wit, alleged no standing.
Number 1) - The Advertiser birth announcement column is headed "Health Bureau Statistics" and that's what is there, Health Bureau statistics; i.e., a listing of births recorded with the city/county/state. Period. Ever heard of "Delayed Registration of Birth?" Now if like other newspapers the Advertiser had listed the hospital . . . .
Number 2) Are people forgetting the Clintons' shenanigans? Do they not remember who the Clintons are? A comparable question is WHAT THE HELL DID OBAMA HAVE ON HILLARY THAT STOPPED HER FROM USING THE BC QUESTION?
Number 3) This is the biggest factor that tells me that something is wrong -- either with the birth certificate or with the man. Either the birth certificate has embarrassing information or the man is an arrogant, hard-headed, egomaniacal SOB who is telling the Constitution and a huge number of American people, F you.
Some great comments. Pinging posters from the earlier FR thread and two with ping lists, before I catch a couple hours of sleep, maybe. ;-)
BTW, both versions of the L.A. Times article are now shown on the I.O. post.
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2008/12/dear-la-times-looks-like-schwarzenegger.html
Do you think Michelle Malkin will refer to it?
Maybe David Horowitz?
/s
That little item has slid into the ether..
never to be mentioned again.
Amend for Obama!
Yeah, if we knew that the Constitution wasn’t going to be enforced, Arnold Schwarzenneger could have or will run for President.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
ping
Why would we elect the worst governor in the nation to be the next president, even if he was eligible.
I am Republican living in California and trust me, I’m no fan of Arnold. But....If a Kenyan-born person with Indonesian citizenship can become president, why not an Austrian as well?
As far as that little thing called the Constitution goes, it has been essentially ignored since the New Deal so why bother fretting over trivial matters such as the citizenship requirements of our presidents?
Tammy Bruce on Laura Ingraham show is talking about Arnold and the Presidency.
BUMP
Somebody pass me a barf bag...
~LOL~ this is very amusing.
More also at:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/williams/081222
http://www.renewamerica.us/images/columns/081222williams_large.jpg
Very interesting, the new article with the same title, has NO mention about the presidency and the qualifications needed.
Schwarzenegger reveals tricks of the trade on ‘60 Minutes’
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-arnold22-2008dec22,0,4603515.story
