Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ga medic
At least some of the most damaging evidence against the governor came from his attempt to sell Obama’s senate seat. How could he have gotten this information prior to Obama’s election?

Do you really think he began discussing the "sale" of the seat only after the Nov. 4th election?

8 posted on 12/16/2008 10:59:49 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Puppage

No, but I would imagine that the prosecutor wanted to wait until the seat was actually guaranteed, so that the conversations were based in reality rather than just a possibility. He was probably waiting to see who would come around looking to buy the seat, and what other information he could gather on the Chicago political machine.

I think Fitzgerald was absolutely correct in getting as much of the discussion on tape as possible, and making sure his investigation was complete. He is well-known to be a very thorough prosecutor. He likes to have so much evidence that the conclusion is never in doubt.

It is unfortunate that the information was not out in time for the election, but Fitzgerald is too professional to let the election dictate the results of his case.


11 posted on 12/16/2008 11:31:44 AM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson