You said — “You are spinning, furiously. You misstate the cases of Leo and Cort then spin that as ‘well, they are in the end about Obama’s BC’, when of course they were not and were in fact suits not with Obama but the SoS of NJ and CT. Then, when called for dissembling, of course you tried to dismiss your misdirection as suing Obama for his BC when he was whom the two cases addressed!”
You’re getting too tangled up in the details to recognize that they are *all* (every last single one of them) — about — Obama not being qualified to serve as President of the United States, per the Constitution — no matter what the legal details are.
*That* is the entire motivation of this whole spate of lawsuits. If anyone can’t see that, then they are beyond hope (again, *no matter* what the legal details are...)....
One last time, the Leo and Cort cases were about the failure of the Sect of State of NJ and CT to properly vett candidates on the ballots of those states. The two cases were first and foremost about Constitutional eligibility. The fact that three persons were named as ineligible, not just Obama, seems to be a niggling fact you wish to ignore and paint this as attacking your belove messiah. The cases were/are/will always be first about protecting the Contract We The People were supposed to have with our elected representatives and OUR government.
When Obama is dead and gone, if this nation still exists to read her History, the issue of following the Constitution will be the central issue of this entire Constitutional Crisis caused by this little Chicago squirrel. But you appear more than willing to spin on for your poseur president, so spin ahead, continue to obfuscate by playing misdirection! Your affirmative action fraud is not as important as the Constitution, but I doubt you are even capable of comprehending that!